A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery

12Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the level of patient pain during the phacoemulsification and implantation of foldable intraocular lenses while under topical, intracameral, or sub-Tenon lidocaine. Patients and methods: This was a retrospective study. Three hundred and one eyes subjected to cataract surgery were included in this study. All eyes underwent phacoemulsification surgery and intraocular lens implantation using topical, sub-Tenon, or intracameral anesthesia. The topical group received 4% lidocaine drops, and the intracameral group received a 0.1–0.2 cc infusion of 1% preservative-free lidocaine into the anterior chamber through the side port combined with topical drops of lidocaine. The sub-Tenon group received 2% lidocaine. Best-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell loss, and intraoperative pain level were evaluated. Pain level was assessed on a visual analog scale (range 0–2). Results: There were no significant differences in visual outcome and corneal endothelial cell loss between the three groups. The mean pain score in the sub-Tenon group was significantly lower than that in the topical and intracameral groups (P=0.0009 and P=0.0055, respectively). In 250 eyes without high myopia (

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hosoda, Y., Kuriyama, S., Jingami, Y., Hattori, H., Hayashi, H., & Matsumoto, M. (2016). A comparison of patient pain and visual outcome using topical anesthesia versus regional anesthesia during cataract surgery. Clinical Ophthalmology, 10, 1139–1144. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S109360

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free