Psychological predictors of adherence to oral hypoglycaemic agents: an application of the ProMAS questionnaire

12Citations
Citations of this article
94Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to identify psychological predictors of oral hypoglycaemic agent (OHA) adherence and to compare adherence rates between a novel and well-known instrument, i.e. the Probabilistic Medication Adherence Scale (ProMAS) and Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5). Design and main outcome measures: A longitudinal study design was applied with surveys at baseline and 6-month follow-up. At baseline, OHA adherence using the ProMAS and MARS-5, socio-cognitive determinants and demographics were assessed. At follow-up, the ProMAS was applied as outcome measure, on which socio-cognitive determinants and demographics were regressed using linear regression analysis. Results: The baseline and follow-up sample included 304 and 231 participants, respectively. When applying cut-off points of ≥15 for the ProMAS and ≥23 for the MARS-5, 47.4 and 89.5% adhered to their OHAs. Consistent predictors of better adherence comprised a low education, lower severity perceptions, and higher self-efficacy and intention. After correcting for baseline adherence, a low education and higher self-efficacy remained significant adherence predictors. Conclusions: Compared to the MARS-5, ProMAS data was less skewed, similar to objectively collected data, and yielded insights in a broader spectrum of (non)-adherence behaviours. Results stress the need for adherence improving interventions which particularly should target higher educated patients and patients with low self-efficacy, low intention and high severity perceptions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vluggen, S., Hoving, C., Schaper, N. C., & De Vries, H. (2020). Psychological predictors of adherence to oral hypoglycaemic agents: an application of the ProMAS questionnaire. Psychology and Health, 35(4), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2019.1672873

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free