Randomized phase II clinical trial of chemo-immunotherapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer patients treated with chemotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy. We tested doxetacel plus cisplatinum as chemotherapy protocol. An immunomodulatory adjuvant system was added as chemoimmunotherapy to the previously mentioned protocol. This system contains three well-known and complementary conditioners of protective immune-responses: cyclophosphamide low-dose, granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulant factor and magnesium silicate granuloma. Eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned to receive every 3-weeks one of the treatments under comparison. Patients received four cycles of treatment unless disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was documented. The maximum follow-up was one year. In each arm, tumor response (rate,duration), median survival time, 1-year overall survival, safety, and immunity modifi cations were assessed. Immunity was evaluated by submitting peripheral blood mononuclear cells to laboratory tests for nonspecifi c immunity: a) phytohemaglutinininduced lymphocyte proliferation, b) prevalence of T-Regulatory (CD4+CD25+) cells and for specifi c immunity: a) lymphocyte proliferation induced by tumor-associated antigens (TAA) contained in a previously described autologous thermostable hemoderivative. The difference (chemotherapy vs. chemoimmunotherapy) in response rate induced by the two treatments (39.0% and 35.0%) was not statistically signifi cant. However, the response duration (22 and 31 weeks), the median survival time (32 and 44 weeks) and 1-year survival (33.3% and 39.1%) were statistically higher with chemoimmunotherapy. No difference in toxicity between both arms was demonstrated. A switch in the laboratory immunity profi le, nonspecifi c and specifi c, was associated with the chemoimmunotherapy treatment: increase of proliferative lymphocyte response, decrease of tolerogenic T-regulatory cells and eliciting TAA-sensitization. © 2008 Lasalvia-Prisco et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors

14966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Activating Mutations in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Underlying Responsiveness of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer to Gefitinib

10542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Toxicology and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

9539Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Strengths and weaknesses of immunotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 12 randomized controlled trials

33Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Addition of an induction regimen of antiangiogenesis and antitumor immunity to standard chemotherapy improves survival in advanced malignancies

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lasalvia-Prisco, E., Garcia-Giralt, E., Vázquez, J., Aghazarian, M., Lasalvia-Galante, E., Larrañaga, J., & Spera, G. (2008). Randomized phase II clinical trial of chemo-immunotherapy in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer. Biologics: Targets and Therapy, 2(3), 555–561. https://doi.org/10.2147/btt.s2685

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

70%

Researcher 3

30%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

78%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 1

11%

Sports and Recreations 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free