Banff 2013 update: Pearls and pitfalls in transplant renal pathology

28Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pathological classification of rejection in renal allografts (Banff classification) has undergone substantial evolution for more than 20 years, and has been the diagnostic gold standard in clinical practice. The 2013 updated Banff classification encompasses a revised scheme of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) that consists of donor-specific antibody (DSA) positivity, characteristic histological manifestations for both acute and chronic ABMR, and DSA-induced endothelial cell injury which is represented by either C4d positivity, microvascular inflammation or expression of activated endothelial gene transcripts. Other modified criteria include a C4d positivity threshold, and histological definition of transplant glomerulitis and transplant glomerulopathy. Morphologically, glomerulonephritis, either recurrent or de novo, can be challenging to differentiate from ABMR-mediated transplant glomerulitis. Endothelial arteritis by itself does not warrant the diagnosis of acute T-cell mediated rejection; ABMR should also be considered based on the DSA test results. With regard to polyomavirus BK-associated nephropathy, immunohistochemical examination using anti-simian virus (SV) 40 antibody can be a promising method to assess the quantitative viral load of polyomavirus BK and graft survival. In summary, the 2013 updated Banff classification strictly defines ABMR with histopathological and serological criteria irrespective of C4d positivity. Inclusion of gene expression data relevant to ABMR highlights that the Banff criteria have entered the era of 'Seeing the Unseen' schemes, reflecting recent advances in understanding the molecular events in allograft injury.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hara, S. (2015, July 1). Banff 2013 update: Pearls and pitfalls in transplant renal pathology. Nephrology. https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.12474

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free