A solar cycle lost in 1793-1800: Early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery

88Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of the lack of reliable sunspot observations, the quality of the sunspot number series is poor in the late 18th century, leading to the abnormally long solar cycle (1784-1799) before the Dalton minimum. Using the newly recovered solar drawings by the 18-19th century observers Staudacher and Hamilton, we construct the solar butterfly diagram, i.e., the latitudinal distribution of sunspots in the 1790s. The sudden, systematic occurrence of sunspots at high solar latitudes in 1793-1796 unambiguously shows that a new cycle started in 1793, which was lost in the traditional Wolf sunspot series. This finally confirms the existence of the lost cycle that has been proposed earlier, thus resolving an old mystery. This Letter brings the attention of the scientific community to the need of revising the sunspot series in the 18th century. The presence of a new short, asymmetric cycle implies changes and constraints to sunspot cycle statistics, solar activity predictions, and solar dynamo theories, as well as for solar-terrestrial relations. © 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Usoskin, I. G., Mursula, K., Arlt, R., & Kovaltsov, G. A. (2009). A solar cycle lost in 1793-1800: Early sunspot observations resolve the old mystery. Astrophysical Journal, 700(2 PART 2). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/700/2/L154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free