Defining and theorizing the third sector

97Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

According to some, the third sector is unsuited to singular definitions because it is by its nature unruly. However, different definitions or theorizations can be identified. Ontologically oriented definitions of the third sector offer differing views on what it is made up of and what is excluded. Thus, an American view defines it as a separate sector characterized by organized, private, nonprofit, and voluntary entities. A European definition sees it as a hybrid phenomenon combining and connecting other sectors such as state and market (this allows social enterprises and [welfare] state bodies in). In contrast, epistemologically oriented theorizations treat the third sector more as a process or form of practice: a particular type of communication (following systems theory), a form of ordering and governing of people (following discourse theory), or a form of struggle or dialogue between social forces (following critical theory). © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Corry, O. (2010). Defining and theorizing the third sector. In Third Sector Research (pp. 11–20). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5707-8_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free