Family Discussions of Early Childhood Social Transitions

17Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: An increasing number of children are socially transitioning to live as their identified genders rather than their assigned sexes, yet little empirical work has examined the decision-making process surrounding social transitions. We aimed to understand (a) why parents and their gender-nonconforming children do and do not consider social transitions and (b) whether families discuss social transitions both before and after initial social transitions. Method: Studies 1 and 2 involved telephone interviews of parents of socially transitioned transgender children (N= 60) and gender- nonconforming children who were not socially transitioned (N= 60), respectively. Study 3 involved an online survey of 266 parents of socially transitioned transgender children. Results: Parents of socially transitioned transgender children (Study 1) and parents of gender-nonconforming children who are not socially transitioned (Study 2) often reported that their children had led the decision to transition or not. Most parents of gender- nonconforming children who had not transitioned had discussed transitioning (Study 2), and most parents of socially transitioned transgender children reported discussing the option of future retransitions (Study 3). Conclusions: Parents often report that they and their children are discussing social transitions, a process that children are leading. In contrast to possible concerns about discussing transitions, our results suggest that many families openly discuss the possibility of their children transitioning (or retransitioning), yet these discussions do not inevitably lead to an imminent transition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Olson, K. R., Blotner, C., Alonso, D., Lewis, K., Edwards, D., & Durwood, L. (2019). Family Discussions of Early Childhood Social Transitions. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 7(3), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/cpp0000289

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free