Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis by etiology

131Citations
Citations of this article
130Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Many national guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination of immunocompromised patients, although the decision to vaccinate is usually at clinical discretion. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analyses to assess the evidence for influenza vaccination in this group, and we report our results by etiology. Meta-analyses showed significantly lower odds of influenza-like illness after vaccination in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, patients with cancer, and transplant recipients and of laboratory-confirmed influenza in HIV-positive patients, compared with patients receiving placebo or no vaccination. Pooled odds of seroconversion and seroprotection were typically lower in HIV-positive patients, patients with cancer, and transplant recipients, compared with immunocompetent controls. Vaccination was generally well tolerated, with variation in mild adverse events between etiological groups. Limited evidence of a transient increase in viremia and a decrease in the percentage of CD4+ cells in HIV-positive patients was found although not accompanied by worsening of clinical symptoms. Clinical judgment remains important when discussing the benefits and safety profile with immunocompromised patients. © 2012 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beck, C. R., McKenzie, B. C., Hashim, A. B., Harris, R. C., & Nguyen-Van-Tam, J. S. (2012). Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis by etiology. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 206(8), 1250–1259. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis487

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free