A Markov Logic Approach to Bio-Molecular Event Extraction

79Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper we describe our entry to the BioNLP 2009 Shared Task regarding bio- molecular event extraction. Our work can be described by three design decisions: (1) instead of building a pipeline using local classifier technology, we design and learn a joint probabilistic model over events in a sentence; (2) instead of developing spe- cific inference and learning algorithms for our joint model, we apply Markov Logic, a general purpose Statistical Relation Learn- ing language, for this task; (3) we represent events as relational structures over the to- kens of a sentence, as opposed to structures that explicitly mention abstract event en- tities. Our results are competitive: we achieve the 4th best scores for task 1 (in close range to the 3rd place) and the best results for task 2 with a 13 percent point margin.

References Powered by Scopus

Markov logic networks

2166Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and MaxEnt discriminative reranking

790Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The CoNLL-2008 shared task on joint parsing of syntactic and semantic dependencies

387Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Joint event extraction via recurrent neural networks

661Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Exploiting argument information to improve event detection via supervised attention mechanisms

223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Survey of Event Extraction from Text

161Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Riedel, S., Chun, H. W., Takagi, T., & Tsujii, J. (2009). A Markov Logic Approach to Bio-Molecular Event Extraction. In 2009 Biomedical Natural Language Processing Workshop, BioNLP 2009 - Companion Volume: Shared Task on Event Extraction (pp. 41–49). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/1572340.1572347

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2508162432

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 36

55%

Researcher 19

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 58

83%

Linguistics 6

9%

Engineering 3

4%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0