A corpus-based study on chinese efl learners' acquisition of english existential construction

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This corpus-based study examines English existential construction used by intermediate and advanced level Chinese EFL (English as a Foreign Language) learners. The corpora adopted are the sub-corpora of SWECCL2.0—TEM 4 Oral and TEM 8 Oral and a sub-corpora of COCA. The study concludes Chinese EFL learners tend to overuse English existential construction and prefer the basic tenses, simple intransitive verbs and commonly seen expressions, avoid the perfect tenses and the difficult forms. With the level of proficiency in English getting higher, Chinese students try to use fewer English existential sentences. The study also finds errors relevant to the tenses, agreements and misuse of “there + have” pattern made in TEM 4 Oral and more difficult participle errors made in TEM 8 Oral and the main reason of errors made in English existential acquisition is due to L1 transfer/ L1 influence

References Powered by Scopus

Topic Prominence in Japanese EFL Students’ Existential Constructions

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The (Non-)acquisition of the Chinese Definiteness Effect: A Usage-Based Account

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The features and factors in the acquisition of English existential constructions at the syntax–pragmatics interface by Chinese learners

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X. (2016). A corpus-based study on chinese efl learners’ acquisition of english existential construction. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(4), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0704.10

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

77%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 8

67%

Arts and Humanities 2

17%

Social Sciences 1

8%

Environmental Science 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free