Development of a Novel Assay for Direct Assessment of Selective Amylin Receptor Activation Reveals Novel Differences in Behavior of Selective and Nonselective Peptide Agonists

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Dual amylin and calcitonin receptor agonists (DACRAs) show promise as efficacious therapeutics for treatment of metabolic disease, including obesity. However, differences in efficacy in vivo have been observed for individual DACRAs, indicating that detailed understanding of the pharmacology of these agents across target receptors is required for rational drug development. To date, such understanding has been hampered by lack of direct, subtype-selective, functional assays for the amylin receptors (AMYRs). Here, we describe the generation of receptor-specific assays for recruitment of Venus-tagged Gs protein through fusion of luciferase to either the human calcitonin receptor (CTR), human receptor activity-modifying protein (RAMP)-1, RAMP1 (AMY1R), human RAMP2 (AMY2R), or human RAMP3 (AMY3R). These assays revealed a complex pattern of receptor activation by calcitonin, amylin, or DACRA peptides that was distinct at each receptor subtype. Of particular note, although both of the CT-based DACRAs, sCT and AM1784, displayed relatively similar behaviors at CTR and AMY1R, they generated distinct responses at AMY2R and AMY3R. These data aid the rationalization of in vivo differences in response to DACRA peptides in rodent models of obesity. Direct assessment of the pharmacology of novel DACRAs at AMYR subtypes is likely to be important for development of optimized therapeutics for treatment of metabolic diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Keov, P., Christopoulos, G., Hick, C. A., Glendorf, T., Ballarín-González, B., Wootten, D., & Sexton, P. M. (2024). Development of a Novel Assay for Direct Assessment of Selective Amylin Receptor Activation Reveals Novel Differences in Behavior of Selective and Nonselective Peptide Agonists. Molecular Pharmacology, 105(5), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1124/molpharm.123.000865

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free