Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type

34Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Two experiments explored the role of environmental cues in maintaining spatial orientation (sense of selflocation and direction) during locomotion. Of particular interest was the importance of geometric cues (provided by environmental surfaces) and featural cues (nongeometric properties provided by striped walls) in maintaining spatial orientation. Participants performed a spatial updating task within virtual environments containing geometric or featural cues that were ambiguous or unambiguous indicators of self-location and direction. Cue type (geometric or featural) did not affect performance, but the number and ambiguity of environmental cues did. Gender differences, interpreted as a proxy for individual differences in spatial ability and/or experience, highlight the interaction between cue quantity and ambiguity. When environmental cues were ambiguous, men stayed oriented with either one or two cues, whereas women stayed oriented only with two. When environmental cues were unambiguous, women stayed oriented with one cue. © 2009 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

References Powered by Scopus

Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis.

2328Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation

912Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability

759Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

What determines our navigational abilities?

587Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Landmarks: Giscience for intelligent services

115Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Spatial perspective taking is an embodied process, but not for everyone in the same way: Differences predicted by sex and social skills score

80Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, J. W., McNamara, T. P., Bodenheimer, B., Carr, T. H., & Rieser, J. J. (2009). Individual differences in using geometric and featural cues to maintain spatial orientation: Cue quantity and cue ambiguity are more important than cue type. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16(1), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.176

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 32

64%

Researcher 9

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 7

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 38

76%

Computer Science 5

10%

Neuroscience 5

10%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free