Control mechanisms of photosynthetic capacity under elevated CO 2 concentration: Evidence from three experiments with Norway spruce trees

12Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Twelve-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) were exposed to ambient (AC) or elevated (EC) [ambient + 350 μmol(CO2) mol -1] CO2 concentration [CO2] using the facilities of open-top-chambers (OTCs) and glass domes (GDs). A combination of gas exchange measurements and application of a biochemical model of photosynthesis were used for the evaluation of CO2 assimilation characteristics. Morphological change was assessed on the base of specific leaf area (SLA). Nitrogen (N) content in the assimilation apparatus was considered a main factor influencing the biochemical capacity. Three experiments confirm the hypothesis that an adjustment of photosynthetic capacity under EC is controlled by the combination of biochemical, morphological, and physiological feedback mechanisms. We observed periodicity of down-regulation of photosynthetic capacity (Experiment No. 1) during the vegetation seasons. In the spring months (May-June), i.e. during the occurrence of active carbon sink associated with the formation of new foliage, up-regulation (10-35%) of photosynthetic capacity (PNsat) was observed. On the contrary, in the autumn months (September-October) down-regulation (25-35%) of PNsat was recorded that was mainly associated with reduced carbon sink strength and biochemical change, i.e. decrease of N status (up to 32%) and accumulation of saccharides (up to 72%) in leaves. Different adjustments of photosynthetic activities were observed in current (C) and one-year-old (C-1) needles exposed to EC (Experiment No. 2). Strong down-regulation of PNsat and the diminution of the initial stimulation of photosynthetic rate (PNmax was associated with decreases of both ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase carboxylation activity (by 32%) and RuBP regeneration (by 40%). This performance was tightly correlated with the absence of active carbon sinks, decrease of N content, and starch accumulation in C-1 needles. Finally, different responses of sun- and shade-adapted needles to EC (Experiment No. 3) were associated with the balance between morphological and biochemical changes. Observed PNsat down-regulation (by 22%) of exposed needles in EC was predominantly caused by effects of both higher assimilate accumulation and stronger N dilution, resulting from higher absolute photosynthetic rates and incident irradiances in the upper canopy.

References Powered by Scopus

A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO<inf>2</inf> assimilation in leaves of C<inf>3</inf> species

6994Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The interaction between elevated carbon dioxide and nitrogen nutrition: The physiological and molecular background

887Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO<inf>2</inf>on woody plants

696Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Physiological impacts of elevated CO<inf>2</inf> concentration ranging from molecular to whole plant responses

126Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diurnal dynamics of photosynthetic parameters of Norway spruce trees cultivated under ambient and elevated CO<inf>2</inf>: The reasons of midday depression in CO<inf>2</inf> assimilation

47Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Photosynthesis, N<inf>2</inf> fixation and taproot reserves during the cutting regrowth cycle of alfalfa under elevated CO<inf>2</inf> and temperature

41Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urban, O., Pokorný, R., Kalina, J., & Marek, M. V. (2003). Control mechanisms of photosynthetic capacity under elevated CO 2 concentration: Evidence from three experiments with Norway spruce trees. Photosynthetica, 41(1), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025808428684

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

44%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

28%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

56%

Environmental Science 7

39%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free