Methodology for Optimal Fire Evacuations in Underground Mines Based on Simulated Scenarios

  • Adjiski V
  • Despodov Z
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to develop a methodology that will contribute in locating optimal evacuation routes in case of fire that are based on minimal carbon monoxide (CO) exposure during the evacuation procedures. The proposed methodology is tested using simulated fire scenarios from which CO concentration over time curve is extracted from all available evacuation routes and presented in a weighted form based on the accumulating effect of CO inhalation in the form of fractional effective dose (FED). The safety limits of the FED model on which the optimization process is based are determined using a model for the prediction of carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) levels in human blood. The COHb model is associated with predicted clinical symptoms that are the basis for determining the level of incapacitation at which the mineworkers are incapable of completing their evacuation. Also in the process of improving the fire risk analysis, the proposed methodology enables the development of evacuation plans that are based on the results of modeled fire scenarios combined together with the results of the anticipated hazards generated by CO inhalation. The results presented in this chapter indicate a more precise approach in the process of planning the evacuation system inside the underground mines.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adjiski, V., & Despodov, Z. (2020). Methodology for Optimal Fire Evacuations in Underground Mines Based on Simulated Scenarios. In Fire Safety and Management Awareness. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91213

Readers over time

‘20‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

67%

Researcher 1

33%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 2

67%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0