Short-term effect analysis of radiofrequency ablationcombined chemotherapy on middle and late period non-small cell lung cancer

8Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) combined chemotherapy on middle and late period non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In total, 85 cases of middle and late period NSCLC patients were selected, and were randomly divided into the RFA combined chemotherapy group, RFA treatment group and chemotherapy group. After treatment, the three groups were followed up for computed tomography (CT) scan, and were analyzed for the effect of RFA combined chemotherapy on middle and late period NSCLC. It was found that CT value of RFA combined chemotherapy group decreased signifi­cantly compared to before surgery (P<0.05). The CT value of the RFA group decreased significantly compared to before surgery (P<0.05). The CT value of chemotherapy group was not significantly changed compared to before surgery (P>0.05). The postoperative CT value of the RFA combined chemotherapy group and RFA group was smaller compared to that of the chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Effective rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] of RFA combined chemotherapy group was significantly higher than that of the EFA and chemotherapy groups (P<0.05). Effective rate (CR+PR) of the RFA group was significantly higher than that of the chemotherapy group (P<0.05). By contrast, the progressive rate (P) of RFA combined chemotherapy group was significantly lower than that of the RFA and chemo­therapy groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, RFA combined chemotherapy has obvious effect on middle and late period NSCLC, and is safe and feasible.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yu, S., Wu, Z. Z., Si, H. T., Yang, S., Liu, G. M., & Zhao, X. D. (2016). Short-term effect analysis of radiofrequency ablationcombined chemotherapy on middle and late period non-small cell lung cancer. Oncology Letters, 12(6), 4399–4402. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2016.5276

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free