Analyzing a Decade of Human-Competitive (“HUMIE”) Winners: What Can We Learn?

  • Kannappan K
  • Spector L
  • Sipper M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Techniques in evolutionary computation (EC) haveimproved significantly over the years, leading to asubstantial increase in the complexity of problems thatcan be solved by EC-based approaches. The HUMIES awardsat the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conferenceare designed to recognise work that has not just solvedsome problem via techniques from evolutionarycomputation, but has produced a solution that isdemonstrably human-competitive. In this chapter, wetake a look across the winners of the past 10 years ofthe HUMIES awards, and analyse them to determinewhether there are specific approaches that consistentlyshow up in the HUMIE winners. We believe that thisanalysis may lead to interesting insights regardingprospects and strategies for producing further humancompetitive results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kannappan, K., Spector, L., Sipper, M., Helmuth, T., Cava, W. L., Wisdom, J., & Bernstein, O. (2015). Analyzing a Decade of Human-Competitive (“HUMIE”) Winners: What Can We Learn? (pp. 149–166). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16030-6_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free