Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and billroth II gastrojejunostomy for gastric cancer: Short- and medium-term results of 139 consecutive cases from a single institution

35Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility, safety, and associated 3-year survival outcomes of the totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) for the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods: Herein, we analyzed the clinical data from 139 consecutive patients with gastric cancer who received TLDG at our institution from March of 2007 to March of 2013. Results: TLDG was successfully carried out in 139 patients; no cases were converted to open surgery. The mean operation time was 228.6 ± 51.0 minutes, mean blood loss was 131.2 ± 85.2 mL, and mean number of dissected lymph nodes was 31.1 ± 9.0. The average time to flatus, time to fluid diet, and length of hospital stay were 3.6 ± 1.1 days, 4.8 ± 1.6 days, and 9.8 ± 4.0 days, respectively. The postoperative morbidity was 10.1%. A total of 135 patients were followed for a subsequent 1-73 months (median, 24.0 months). The 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 82.3% and 82.9%, respectively. When divided by stage, the 3-year DFS for stage I, II, and III were 100%, 86.2%, and 48.8%, respectively; and the 3-year OS for stage I, II, and III were 98.0%, 92.3%, and 51.6%, respectively. Conclusions: In this preliminary report, TLDG was found to be a safe, feasible, and efficacious procedure for the treatment of gastric cancer with encouraging 3-year overall and stage-by-stage survival rates. © Ivyspring International Publisher.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, K., Xu, X., Mou, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, R., Zhou, Y., … Huang, C. (2013). Totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy and billroth II gastrojejunostomy for gastric cancer: Short- and medium-term results of 139 consecutive cases from a single institution. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(11), 1462–1470. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.6632

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free