Surgical margins and short-term results of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer

15Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The confines of the narrow bony pelvis make laparoscopic surgery more challenging in the treatment of low rectal cancer. Macroscopic evaluation of the completeness of the mesorectum provides detailed information about the quality of surgery. This study was performed to observe the short-term outcomes and evaluate the macroscopic quality of specimens acquired from laparoscopic total mesorectal excision versus open total mesorectal excision in patients with low rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 177 patients with low rectal cancer underwent total mesorectal excision by either a laparoscopic (n = 87) or open (n = 90) approach. In all cases the surgical time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative bowel opening, and hospital stay were assessed. Special attention was given to the macroscopic judgment concerning the cut edge of peritoneal reflection, Denonvilliers fascia, completeness of the mesorectum, and bowel wall below the mesorectum. Results: The surgical time was 160 ± 40 minutes in the laparoscopic group. It was not significantly different from that in the open group (P =.782). The operative blood loss was 28 ± 5 mL in the group undergoing laparoscopic surgery and 80 ± 20 mL in the group undergoing open surgery (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, Q., Xiu, P., Qi, X., Yi, G., & Xu, L. (2013). Surgical margins and short-term results of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer. Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons, 17(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680813X13654754534675

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free