Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter

26Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The set of design features developed by Charles Hockett in the 1950s and 1960s remains probably the most influential means of juxtaposing animal communication with human language. However, the general theoretical perspective of Hockett is largely incompatible with that of modern language evolution research. Consequently, we argue that his classificatory system—while useful for some descriptive purposes—is of very limited use as a theoretical framework for evolutionary linguistics. We see this incompatibility as related to the ontology of language, i.e. deriving from Hockett’s interest in language as a product rather than a suite of sensorimotor, cognitive and social abilities that enable the use but also acquisition of language by biological creatures (the faculty of language). After a reconstruction of Hockett’s views on design features, we raise two criticisms: focus on the means at the expense of content and focus on the code itself rather than the cognitive abilities of its users. Finally, referring to empirical data, we illustrate some of the problems resulting from Hockett’s approach by addressing three specific points—namely arbitrariness and semanticity, cultural transmission, and displacement—and show how the change of perspective allows to overcome those difficulties.

References Powered by Scopus

A Mathematical Theory of Communication

37116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions

3473Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuroscience: The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?

3085Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Wild voices: Mimicry, reversal, metaphor, and the emergence of language

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why Are No Animal Communication Systems Simple Languages?

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The multimodal origins of linguistic communication

19Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wacewicz, S., & Żywiczyński, P. (2015). Language Evolution: Why Hockett’s Design Features are a Non-Starter. Biosemiotics, 8(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-014-9203-2

Readers over time

‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

73%

Professor / Associate Prof. 8

13%

Researcher 7

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Linguistics 26

41%

Psychology 16

25%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12

19%

Social Sciences 10

16%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0