Microbial methanol uptake in northeast Atlantic waters

56Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Methanol is the predominant oxygenated volatile organic compound in the troposphere, where it can significantly influence the oxidising capacity of the atmosphere. However, we do not understand which processes control oceanic concentrations, and hence, whether the oceans are a source or a sink to the atmosphere. We report the first methanol loss rates in seawater by demonstrating that 14C-labelled methanol can be used to determine microbial uptake into particulate biomass, and oxidation to 14CO2. We have found that methanol is used predominantly as a microbial energy source, but also demonstrated its use as a carbon source. We report biological methanol oxidation rates between 2.1 and 8.4 nmol l-1 day-1 in surface seawater of the northeast Atlantic. Kinetic experiments predict a V max of up to 29 nmol l-1 day-1, with a high affinity Km constant of 9.3 nM in more productive coastal waters. We report surface concentrations of methanol in the western English channel of 97±8 nM (n=4) between May and June 2010, and for the wider temperate North Atlantic waters of 70±13 nM (n=6). The biological turnover time of methanol has been estimated between 7 and 33 days, although kinetic experiments suggest a 7-day turnover in more productive shelf waters. Methanol uptake rates into microbial particles significantly correlated with bacterial and phytoplankton parameters, suggesting that it could be used as a carbon source by some bacteria and possibly some mixotrophic eukaryotes. Our results provide the first methanol loss rates from seawater, which will improve the understanding of the global methanol budget. © 2011 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dixon, J. L., Beale, R., & Nightingale, P. D. (2011). Microbial methanol uptake in northeast Atlantic waters. ISME Journal, 5(4), 704–716. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free