Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

7Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive perinatal test (NIPT) used to assess fetal anomalies. The ability to detect fetal chromosomal aneuploidies is directly related to a sample’s fetal to total DNA fraction, known as the fetal fraction (FF). The minimum FF is considered 4%, and the test result below 4% is uncertain due to low fetal fraction (LFF). This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and a meta-analysis to determine the possible factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing for fetal screening. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Since Direct, Scopus, CINHAL, Cochrane Library, and Persian databases, including Scientific Information Database, Irandoc, and Magiran were searched for studies investigating factors affecting LFF in cfDNA testing from 2000 until the end of 2021. Gathered data were analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software version 3.3.070. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal of Cohort Studies tool. Results: Thirteen articles related to the topic were included, and seven related articles were reviewed for meta-analysis. The other six were reviewed qualitatively. Four factors were identified that might have a potential effect on the LFF, of which only gestational age had a significant association with LFF (Pooled mean difference= -1.111, SE = 0.515, 95% CI= -2.121, -0.101, (P-value < 0.05)). Maternal age (P-value = 0.573), maternal weight (P-value = 0.113), and Body Mass Index (P-value = 0.104) had no statically significant effect. The effect size was pooled by mean difference and 95% confidence interval. Conclusion: Lower gestational age is significantly associated with LFF. Thus, this factor can be considered when interpreting prenatal cfDNA screening tests.

References Powered by Scopus

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

5636Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Quantitative analysis of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum: Implications for noninvasive prenatal diagnosis

1454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Size Distributions of Maternal and Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma

496Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cell-free DNA as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for adult sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Maternal and Fetal Factors Affecting Cell-Free Fetal DNA (cffDNA) Fraction: A Systematic Review

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Haplotype-based noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of methylmalonic acidemia and the discovery of a recurrent pathogenic haplotype associated with c.609G>A

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mousavi, S., Shokri, Z., Bastani, P., Ghojazadeh, M., Riahifar, S., & Nateghian, H. (2022). Factors affecting low fetal fraction in fetal screening with cell-free DNA in pregnant women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05224-7

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

56%

Researcher 4

44%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

22%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

22%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free