Contributions for a colaborative case management into the Chilean civil procedure: Thinking in a new justice

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The contemporary comparative procedural culture begins to be consistent in the need for a close judge and with an empathic intervention in the proceeding with the parties and their representatives that generates the need for a paradigm transformation. The administration of justice by hearings with the improvement of all organic and financial conditions does not seem to be sufficient without setting roles for the judge and the parties. On the side of the judge imposes a vision that assumes an active managerial role. In this way a symbiosis between the adversarial and inquisitorial systems is verified, because the cooperation of the parties is also necesary. The competition between the parties for obtaining a positive outcome is qualified and balanced with the cooperation imposed on the active conduct that must be performed by the judge as intrinsic value of procedural justice and fairness as framework for a fair, just, rational and efficient justice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aguirrezabal Grünstein, M., & Pérez Ragone, Á. (2018). Contributions for a colaborative case management into the Chilean civil procedure: Thinking in a new justice. Revista de Derecho Privado. Universidad Externado de Colombia. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.n35.11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free