This article traces the evolution of the concept of 'Good Governance', launched as a guiding policy metaphor in international aid circles at the end of the Cold War. As a guiding principle, it was presupposed that it would facilitate the posing of a new generation of 'political conditionalities', aimed at the internal restructuring of government machinery of developing and transitional countries. However, in practice donor agencies soon found it more complex to handle than they had thought it would be. A new approach, advocating 'selectivity' as a criterion for entering into aid relationships, initiated by the World Bank, seemed to offer a way out: 'good governance' was to become now a pre-condition for countries keen to receive development aid. By implication, reform of 'governance' as such would receive less prominence as an aid policy objective in its own right. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences is the property of Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
CITATION STYLE
Doornbos, M. R. (2004). ‘GOOD GOVERNANCE’: THE PLIABILITY OF A POLICY CONCEPT. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(4), 372. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2004.4.03
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.