Response to "comment on 'numerical study of electrical transport in inhomogeneous Schottky diodes' " [J. Appl. Phys. 88, 7366 (2000)]

7Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In his comment [J. Appl. Phys. 88, 7366 (2000)] Tung brings into question the appropriateness of some of the simulation conditions used in J. Appl. Phys. 85, 1935 (1999) and the conclusion taken from the results. This Response explains that the differences in the conclusions between our work and the work of Sullivan et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 70, 7403 (1991)] are caused by the differences in the parameters of the inhomogeneous structures described. It is also shown that the numerical experiments made by Sullivan et al. [J. Appl. Phys. 70, 7403 (1991)] were done for special diode parameters, and they probably did not support such general conclusions as were made. © 2000 American Institute of Physics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osvald, J. (2000, December 15). Response to "comment on “numerical study of electrical transport in inhomogeneous Schottky diodes” " [J. Appl. Phys. 88, 7366 (2000)]. Journal of Applied Physics. American Institute of Physics Inc. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1324997

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free