Democratic Deficit, the Global Trade System and 11 September

7Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This short paper examines the Howard government's engagement with the World Trade Organization through the prism of two events: the S11 anti-globalisation protests and the 11 September terrorist attacks against the United States. Several policy dilemmas are highlighted including: concerns about the accountability and legitimacy of global political institutions (democratic deficit); the government's reluctance to expand public participation in trade policy-making; and the preference for bilateral rather than multilateral trade agreements. Together these developments have undermined Australia's commitment to multilateralism and a "rules-based" system for international trade, and have subjected Australia to the asymmetries of power that were traditionally mitigated by global political institutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Capling, A. (2003). Democratic Deficit, the Global Trade System and 11 September. Australian Journal of Politics and History. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8497.00292

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free