Erceg et al. (J Monet Econ 46:281-313, 2000) introduce sticky wages in a New-Keynesian general-equilibrium model. Alternatively, it is shown here how wage stickiness may bring unemployment fluctuations into a New-Keynesian model. Using a Bayesian econometric approach, both models are estimated with US quarterly data of the Great Moderation. Estimation results are similar in the two models and both provide a good empirical fit, with the crucial difference that our model delivers unemployment fluctuations. Thus, second-moment statistics of the US rate of unemployment are replicated reasonably well in our proposed New-Keynesian model with sticky wages. Demand-side shocks play a more important role than technology innovations or cost-push shock in explaining both output and unemployment fluctuations. In the welfare analysis, the cost of cyclical fluctuations during the Great Moderation is estimated at 0. 60% of steady-state consumption. © 2011 The Author(s).
CITATION STYLE
Casares, M., Moreno, A., & Vázquez, J. (2012). Wage stickiness and unemployment fluctuations: An alternative approach. SERIEs, 3(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-011-0079-y
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.