In justified anger1

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There were certain assumptions underlying the (early) government response to the pandemic in Britain. The first one was to try and preserve capital accumulation for the very rich by making the rest of the population suffer, a population that had experienced austerity for years. The second assumption signifying thinly disguised racism was to deny that what originated in China had any relevance to the United Kingdom. A corollary of this was: if other countries wished to shut down, the United Kingdom would reap the benefits. These assumptions which led to relative inactivity in the early stage of the pandemic prompt us to ask: what human value system puts the preservation of the capitalist market economy above saving human lives?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

O’Keefe, P., & O’Keefe, P. (2020). In justified anger1. Human Geography(United Kingdom), 13(2), 191–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1942778620937413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free