Nicotine improves sustained attention in mice: Evidence for involvement of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor

196Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In humans, nicotine has been shown to improve attention in both normal and impaired individuals. Observations in rats reflect some, but not all aspects of the nicotine-induced improvements in humans. To date these findings have not been replicated in mice. To examine the effect of nicotine on sustained attention in mice, we have established a version of the 5-choice serial reaction-time (5-CSR) task with graded levels of difficulty, based upon spatial displacement and a variable intertrial interval. Using this paradigm, microgram doses of nicotine produced a consistent reduction in the level of omissions and an improvement in proportion correct in normal mice. This improvement in sustained attention was made irrespectively of whether mice had previously received nicotine. In an attempt to elucidate which nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) subtype(s) mediate this effect, we examined the performance of α7 nAChR knockout (KO) mice in the 5-CSR task α7 nAChR KO mice not only acquired the task more slowly than their wild-type littermates, but on attaining asymptotic performance, they exhibited a higher level of omissions. In conclusion, by increasing the level of task difficulty, the performance of mice was maintained at sufficiently low levels to allow a demonstrable improvement in performance upon nicotine administration. Furthermore, as α7 KO mice are clearly impaired in the acquisition and asymptotic performance of this task the α7 nAChR may be involved in mediating these effects of nicotine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Young, J. W., Finlayson, K., Spratt, C., Marston, H. M., Crawford, N., Kelly, J. S., & Sharkey, J. (2004). Nicotine improves sustained attention in mice: Evidence for involvement of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29(5), 891–900. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300393

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free