A Valid and Fast Spatial Bootstrap for Correlation Functions

  • Loh J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, we examine the validity of non-parametric spatial bootstrap as a procedure to quantify errors in estimates of N-point correlation functions. We do this by means of a small simulation study with simple point process models and estimating the two-point correlation functions and their errors. The coverage of confidence intervals obtained using bootstrap is compared with those obtained from assuming Poisson errors. The bootstrap procedure considered here is adapted for use with spatial (i.e. dependent) data. In particular, we describe a marked point bootstrap where, instead of resampling points or blocks of points, we resample marks assigned to the data points. These marks are numerical values that are based on the statistic of interest. We describe how the marks are defined for the two- and three-point correlation functions. By resampling marks, the bootstrap samples retain more of the dependence structure present in the data. Furthermore, this method of bootstrap can be performed much quicker than some other bootstrap methods for spatial data, making it a more practical method with large datasets. We find that with clustered point datasets, confidence intervals obtained using the marked point bootstrap has empirical coverage closer to the nominal level than the confidence intervals obtained using Poisson errors. The bootstrap errors were also found to be closer to the true errors for the clustered point datasets.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Loh, J. M. (2008). A Valid and Fast Spatial Bootstrap for Correlation Functions. The Astrophysical Journal, 681(1), 726–734. https://doi.org/10.1086/588631

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

61%

Researcher 13

34%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Physics and Astronomy 18

58%

Mathematics 6

19%

Environmental Science 4

13%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 3

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0