African Gender Research and Postcoloniality: Legacies and Challenges

  • Lewis D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Much African gender research draws extensively on the discipline of anthropology, and the predominant emphasis in many gender initiatives on the continent remains technocratic and narrowly developmentalist. Alternatives to traditional anthropological and technicist methods and ideas have been developed by feminist scholars in a variety of fields. In historical research from the late 80s, for example, Fatima Mernissi (1988) and Bonlanle Awe (1991) explored the need for “herstory” in African historiography, with their comprehensive accounts of women’s agency and subordination transcending the limitations of insular anthropology and developmentalism. Developing these themes in more recent work, Cheryl Johnson-Odim and Nina Mba in For Women and the Nation (1997) link the texture of historical process to a Nigerian woman’s life narrative in order to approach issues of gender and development from a holistic and humanist point of view.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewis, D. (2005). African Gender Research and Postcoloniality: Legacies and Challenges. In African Gender Studies A Reader (pp. 381–395). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09009-6_21

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free