Accountability for Governance Choices in Artificial Intelligence: Afterword to Eyal Benvenisti's Foreword

15Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A growing body of literature examines how to make the use of new and emerging technologies more transparent and explainable as a means to ensure accountability for harm to human rights. While a critical part of accountability, a predominant focus on the technology can result in the design and adaptation of accountability principles to 'manage' the technology instead of starting from an assessment of the governance choices actors make when integrating new and emerging technologies into their mandates. Recognition of the governance choices underpinning the introduction of new and emerging technologies is often overlooked in scholarship and practice. Yet, without explicit recognition of the role played by technology in governance, the disruptive effects of technology on (global) governance may be underplayed or even ignored. In this response, I argue that if the 'culture of accountability' is to adapt to the challenges posed by new and emerging technologies, the focus cannot only be technologyled. It must also be interrogative of the governance choices that are made within organizations, particularly those vested with public functions at the international and national level.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McGregor, L. (2018, December 31). Accountability for Governance Choices in Artificial Intelligence: Afterword to Eyal Benvenisti’s Foreword. European Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy086

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free