Viability of probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 and their impact on sensory and rheological properties of milk and dark chocolates during storage for 180 days

71Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The popularity of chocolate as food around the world combined with high level of health-related awareness of the contemporary consumer, imposed the idea of enriching composition of different kinds of chocolate with probiotic bacterial strains. In this study, two strains of probiotic bacteria, Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. ® and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019, were incorporated in milk and dark chocolate. Final products were kept at two temperatures (4 °C and 20 °C) at which viability of added strains was monitored with the aim of determining the recommended storage temperature. In order to determine the effects of probiotics an examination of their sensory and rheological properties was carried out immediately after production (0-30 days) and during storage of 90 and 180 days. Based on the obtained results it can be seen that the probiotic strain L. acidophilus NCFM. ® exerted higher viability compared to strain B. lactis HN019 in both kinds of chocolates, while a greater number of cells of both strains was determined at 4 °C. The increase in yield stress of chocolates with probiotics with larger granulation was observed, while the apparent and plastic viscosity did not experience major changes. Despite the occasionally noticed sandiness, sensory properties of chocolates were not significantly changed during storage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lalicic-Petronijevic, J., Popov-Raljić, J., Obradović, D., Radulović, Z., Paunović, D., Petrušić, M., & Pezo, L. (2015). Viability of probiotic strains Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM® and Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 and their impact on sensory and rheological properties of milk and dark chocolates during storage for 180 days. Journal of Functional Foods, 15, 541–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.03.046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free