Phenomenology, “Grundwissenschaft” and “Ideologiekritik”: Hermann Zeltner’s Critique of the Erlangen school

0Citations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper is visibly connected neither to relations between the Erlangen school and logical empiricism Empiricism, nor to any problems of logic. I will instead be concerned with whether Wilhelm Kamlah and Paul Lorenzen were possibly influenced by the discussion of phenomenological issues by certain philosophers active in Erlangen shortly before or during the development of the so-called Erlangen school in the Mid-1960s. It is claimed that there was no real discussion or exchange of ideas between the protagonists of constructive philosophy and those in the Erlangen Institute closer to phenomenology Phenomenology, neo-Kantianism, or “new ontology”, although some of them were concerned with similar problems and, like Hermann Zeltner, attempted to establish a dialogue from time to time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thiel, C. (2014). Phenomenology, “Grundwissenschaft” and “Ideologiekritik”: Hermann Zeltner’s Critique of the Erlangen school. In Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning (Vol. 3, pp. 11–19). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03044-9_2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free