Living Lab Evaluation for Life and Social Sciences Search Platforms - LiLAS at CLEF 2021

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Meta-evaluation studies of system performances in controlled offline evaluation campaigns, like TREC and CLEF, show a need for innovation in evaluating IR-systems. The field of academic search is no exception to this. This might be related to the fact that relevance in academic search is multi-layered and therefore the aspect of user-centric evaluation is becoming more and more important. The Living Labs for Academic Search (LiLAS) lab aims to strengthen the concept of user-centric living labs for the domain of academic search by allowing participants to evaluate their retrieval approaches in two real-world academic search systems from the life sciences and the social sciences. To this end, we provide participants with metadata on the systems’ content as well as candidate lists with the task to rank the most relevant candidate to the top. Using the STELLA-infrastructure, we allow participants to easily integrate their approaches into the real-world systems and provide the possibility to compare different approaches at the same time.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaer, P., Schaible, J., & Castro, L. J. (2021). Living Lab Evaluation for Life and Social Sciences Search Platforms - LiLAS at CLEF 2021. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 12657 LNCS, pp. 657–664). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72240-1_77

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free