Asymmetrical Tests

  • Scriven M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It is often thought, or presupposed, that investigative tests done for evaluative purposes should be symmetrical—that is, they should be equally capable of giving positive and negative results. This is an error in the logic of evaluation, and it arises from confusion between the asymmetrical ability of a test to yield information and its propensity to yield biased information. Although ‘asymmetrical’ does connote one-sidedness and we often use ‘one-sided’ to mean biased, we can and should use the terms more carefully. Some tests can only yield information about the faults of a program (or product, or person, etc.)—or only about its virtues—while others can yield one of these more reliably than the other, and yet others are symmetrical in their treatment of merits and demerits. All of them gather relevant information for evaluative purposes, and one cannot conclude that any of them are biased simply because they are asymmetrical. The point is important because in many situations, one may only have access to asymmetrical tests and this does not support the claim of a biased approach as long as there is more than one test in the battery used to evaluate, and one test’s asymmetry is balanced out by the other test(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scriven, M. (2006). Asymmetrical Tests. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 3(4), 103–106. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v3i4.80

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free