Prognostic testing in uveal melanoma by transcriptomic profiling of fine needle biopsy specimens

69Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Many uveal melanoma patients die of metastasis despite ocular treatment. Transcriptomic profiling of enucleated tumors can identify patients at high metastatic risk. Because most uveal melanomas do not require enucleation, a biopsy would be required for this analysis. Here, we establish the feasibility of transcriptomic analysis of uveal melanomas from fine needle aspirates. Transcriptomic profiles were analyzed from postenucleation "mock" needle biopsies and matching tumors from eight enucleated eyes and from fine needle aspirates in 17 uveal melanomas before radiotherapy. Predictive accuracy was assessed using a weighted voting classifier optimized for probe set selection using a minimal redundancy/maximum relevance algorithm. Transcriptomic profiles from mock biopsies were highly similar to those from their matching tumor samples (P < 0.0001). Transcriptomic profiles from fine needle aspirates clustered into two classes with discriminating probe sets that overlapped significantly with those for our published classification (P < 0.00001). No loss of predictive accuracy was identified among eight needle aspirates obtained from a distant location. Thus, it is feasible to obtain RNA of adequate quality and quantity to perform transcriptomic analysis on uveal. melanoma samples obtained by fine needle biopsy This method can be applied to specimens obtained from distant geographic locations and can stratify uveal melanoma patients based on metastatic risk. Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Onken, M. D., Worley, L. A., Dávilla, R. M., Char, D. H., & Harbour, J. W. (2006). Prognostic testing in uveal melanoma by transcriptomic profiling of fine needle biopsy specimens. Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 8(5), 567–573. https://doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free