Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: A variety of open-system real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays for several acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 are currently in use. This study aimed to ensure the quality of omicron nucleic acid testing and to assess the comparability of cycle threshold (Ct) values derived from RT-PCR. Methods: Five external quality assessment (EQA) rounds using the omicron virus-like particles were organized between February 2022 and June 2022. Results: A total of 1401 qualitative EQA reports have been collected. The overall positive percentage agreement was 99.72%, the negative percentage agreement was 99.75%, and the percent agreement was 99.73%. This study observed a significant variance in Ct values derived from different test systems. There was a wide heterogeneity in PCR efficiency among different RT-PCR kits and inter-laboratories. Conclusion: There was strong concordance among laboratories performing qualitative omicron nucleic acid testing. Ct values from qualitative RT-PCR tests should not be used for clinical or epidemiological decision-making to avoid the potential for misinterpretation of the results.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fan, G., Jin, Y., Wang, Q., & Yue, Y. (2023). Assessing the comparability of cycle threshold values derived from five external quality assessment rounds for omicron nucleic acid testing. Virology Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-023-02032-z

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free