A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future

378Citations
Citations of this article
321Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems (EGS) have evolved from the hot dry rock concept, implemented for the first time at Fenton Hill in 1977. This paper systematically reviews all of the EGS projects worldwide, based on the information available in the public domain. The projects are classified by country, reservoir type, depth, reservoir temperature, stimulation methods, associated seismicity, plant capacity and current status. Thirty five years on from the first EGS implementation, the geothermal community can benefit from the lessons learnt and take a more objective approach to the pros and cons of ‘conventional’ EGS systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breede, K., Dzebisashvili, K., Liu, X., & Falcone, G. (2013, January 1). A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future. Geothermal Energy. SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1186/2195-9706-1-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free