The legality and ethics of independent intercountry adoption under the hague convention

11Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Permanent Bureau at the Hague Conference shares an organizational and social democratic approach to problem solving for children in need with several child welfare organizations. In accordance with this perspective, the Permanent Bureau has allied itself to the call for the elimination of independent intercountry adoption (ICA) under the 1993 Hague Convention, on both legal and ethical grounds. Independent ICA embodies individual decision making and a liberal approach to problem solving. This has created ideological friction, and it is this friction rather than evidence that explains the campaign against it. The text of the Hague Convention permits independent adoption. Even though opposition to independent adoption was heightened by the crisis in Romania during the negotiations that preceded the Convention, the final draft allowed for it, partly to encourage ratification by the USA. The attempt to treat this compromise as a temporary expedient that can be dispensed with now that the USA has implemented the Convention is not in the best interests of the countless children in need of adoption. © 2011 The Author.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayes, P. (2011). The legality and ethics of independent intercountry adoption under the hague convention. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 25(3), 288–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebr016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free