Design criteria for high power engines crankshafts

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The reliability of any mechanical system, in which the linear displacement of a piston is converted into the rotation of a power transmission shaft, strongly depends on the reliability of the crankshaft. The crankshaft is the critical component and any damage occurring to the crankshaft may put the mechanical system out of order. The numerical finite element simulation of crankshafts with multiple rods is often time consuming even if quite accurate if the aim is to evaluate the stress-strain behavior at the notched area and verify the component. The development of a simplified numerical model would prove effective to reduce the time needed to reach a good approximation design of the crankshaft. The aim of this paper is to give the designer a numerical procedure that allows to determine the strain and stress state and verify crankshafts having two or more rods.

References Powered by Scopus

Effect of the ion nitriding surface hardening process on fatigue behavior of AISI 4340 steel

165Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Influence of the nitriding time in the wear behaviour of an AISI H13 steel during a crankshaft forging process

130Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Surface treatment selections for automotive applications

129Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A theoretical method for structural design and analysis of crankshafts

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Web Optimization of Compression Ignition Aviation Engine Crankshaft

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Load analysis of crankshaft of two-point crank press

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baragetti, S. (2015). Design criteria for high power engines crankshafts. Open Mechanical Engineering Journal, 9(1), 271–281. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874155X01509010271

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 11

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free