Conserving inequality: How private conservation and property developers ‘fix’ spatial injustice in South Africa

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In 2016, South Africa launched its National Biodiversity Economy Strategy. This strategy aims to facilitate the development of a ‘wildlife economy’ as a solution to unemployment, loss of biodiversity and rural development. Central to the strategy is the role of private conservation actors, who keenly posit their commercial model as the best way to achieve these objectives. This stands in sharp contrast to recent critiques that suggest that private conservation reinforces structural inequality by denying access to land and perpetuating unjust labour conditions. Using ethnographic data from the South African Lowveld region that includes the Kruger National Park, the paper takes these points further by arguing that a rapidly growing alliance between private conservation and property developers actively conserve inequality by maintaining and even extending spatial injustice in the region. Two popular recent manifestations of this alliance in particular, share block systems that distribute ownership of access to real estate in private reserves and wildlife housing estates, have established new conservation-property linkages that entrench capitalist socioecological fixes. Not only do these initiatives lead to further engrained spatial injustice, we conclude that this conservation-property alliance at the centre of the ‘wildlife economy’ also willingly sacrifices environmental sustainability on the altar of white conservation imaginations and private profit.

References Powered by Scopus

Justice and the spatial imagination

263Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Black matters are spatial matters: Black geographies for the twenty-first century

214Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

To cull or not to cull: lessons from a southern African drought.

163Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Principles and legal tools for equitable water resource allocation: prioritization in South Africa

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH AVIATION CARBON EMISSIONS AND CARBON FOOTPRINT OF TOURISM IN SOUTH AFRICA: POLICY, REGULATIONS, AND GOVERNANCE ISSUES

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The urban political ecologies of the green spaces of socialist housing estates: an analysis of green spaces in Bucharest, Romania

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thakholi, L., & Büscher, B. (2024). Conserving inequality: How private conservation and property developers ‘fix’ spatial injustice in South Africa. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 7(1), 87–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486211066388

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 5

45%

Environmental Science 4

36%

Philosophy 1

9%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

9%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free