What do you think it means? Using cognitive interviewing to improve measurement in implementation science: description and case example

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pragmatic measures are essential to evaluate the implementation of evidence-based interventions. Cognitive interviewing, a qualitative method that collects partner feedback throughout measure development, is particularly useful for developing pragmatic implementation measures. Measure developers can use cognitive interviewing to increase a measure’s fit within a particular implementation context. However, cognitive interviewing is underused in implementation research, where most measures remain “homegrown” and used for single studies. We provide a rationale for using cognitive interviewing in implementation science studies and illustrate its use through a case example employing cognitive interviewing to inform development of a measurement-based care protocol for implementation in opioid treatment programs. Applications of cognitive interviewing, including developing a common language with partners and collecting multi-level feedback on assessment procedures, to improve measurement in implementation science are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Patel-Syed, Z., Becker, S., Olson, M., Rinella, H., & Scott, K. (2024). What do you think it means? Using cognitive interviewing to improve measurement in implementation science: description and case example. Implementation Science Communications, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-024-00549-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free