Supported Decision Making

  • Bigby C
  • Douglas J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

[Supported decision making (SDM) has begun to receive significant attention as means to enable people to exercise autonomy and self-determination over decisions about their life. Practice frameworks that can be used to promote the provision of supports for decision making are needed. This paper integrates the literature across intellectual and developmental disability, mental health, and aging populations to synthesize issues that should be considered in future research on building systems of supports for SDM. The literature suggests that considering (a) contextual factors relevant to decision making, (b) environmental demands for decision making, and (c) supports needed for decision making is important in the context of considerations of promoting SDM, as is using operational definitions of decision making and supported decision making frameworks. While there has been theoretical and empirical work in each of these areas, no work has comprehensively brought together these areas specific to decision making across multiple life domains. Implications for future research and practice are provided.]

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bigby, C., & Douglas, J. (2020). Supported Decision Making. In Choice, Preference, and Disability (pp. 45–66). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35683-5_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free