Prediction and control in a dynamic environment

12Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The present study compared the accuracy of cue-outcome knowledge gained during prediction-based and control-based learning in stable and unstable dynamic environments. Participants either learnt to make cue-interventions in order to control an outcome, or learnt to predict the outcome from observing changes to the cue values. Study 1 (N = 60) revealed that in tests of control, after a short period of familiarization, performance of Predictors was equivalent to Controllers. Study 2 (N = 28) showed that Controllers showed equivalent task knowledge when to compared to Predictors. Though both Controllers and Predictors showed good performance at test, overall Controllers showed an advantage. The cue-outcome knowledge acquired during learning was sufficiently flexible to enable successful transfer to tests of control and prediction. © 2012 Osman and Speeken-brink.

References Powered by Scopus

A neural substrate of prediction and reward

6702Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited

1658Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A neostriatal habit learning system in humans

1421Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Learning and choosing in an uncertain world: An investigation of the explore-exploit dilemma in static and dynamic environments

69Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Learning Mechanisms Underlying Accurate and Biased Contingency Judgments

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Dynamics of individual perceptual decisions

24Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Osman, M., & Speekenbrink, M. (2012). Prediction and control in a dynamic environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(MAR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00068

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

53%

Researcher 9

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 6

15%

Lecturer / Post doc 4

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 28

80%

Social Sciences 3

9%

Computer Science 2

6%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free