Empowering pyromaniacs in Madagascar: Ideology and legitimacy in community-based natural resource management

87Citations
Citations of this article
172Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Development practitioners frequently rely on community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) as an approach to encourage equitable and sustainable environmental resource use. Based on an analysis of the case of grassland and woodland burning in highland Madagascar, this article argues that the success of CBNRM depends upon the real empowerment of local resource users and attention to legitimacy in local institutions. Two key factors - obstructive environmental ideologies ('received wisdoms') and the complex political and social arena of 'community' governance - challenge empowerment and legitimacy and can transform outcomes. In Madagascar, persistent hesitancy among leaders over the legitimate role of fire has side-tracked a new CBNRM policy called GELOSE away from one of its original purposes - community fire management - towards other applications, such as community management of forest exploitation. In addition, complications with local governance frustrate implementation efforts. As a result, a century long political stalemate over fire continues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kull, C. A. (2002). Empowering pyromaniacs in Madagascar: Ideology and legitimacy in community-based natural resource management. Development and Change, 33(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free