Bridging the gap of standardized animals models for blast neurotrauma: Methodology for appropriate experimental testing

8Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent military combat has heightened awareness to the complexity of blast-related traumatic brain injuries (bTBI). Experiments using animal, cadaver, or biofidelic physical models remain the primary measures to investigate injury biomechanics as well as validate computational simulations, medical diagnostics and therapies, or protection technologies. However, blast injury research has seen a range of irregular and inconsistent experimental methods for simulating blast insults generating results which may be misleading, cannot be cross-correlated between laboratories, or referenced to any standard for exposure. Both the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command and the National Institutes of Health have noted that there is a lack of standardized preclinical models of TBI. It is recommended that the blast injury research community converge on a consistent set of experimental procedures and reporting of blast test conditions. This chapter describes the blast conditions which can be recreated within a laboratory setting and methodology for testing in vivo models within the appropriate environment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

VandeVord, P. J., Leonardi, A. D. C., & Ritzel, D. (2016). Bridging the gap of standardized animals models for blast neurotrauma: Methodology for appropriate experimental testing. In Methods in Molecular Biology (Vol. 1462, pp. 101–118). Humana Press Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3816-2_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free