The Household Financial Losses Triggered by an Immigration Arrest, and How State and Local Government Can Most Effectively Protect Their Constituents

15Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Through a survey of 125 long-term resident households in Pima County, Arizona, this study finds that an immigration arrest costs each household an average of more than $24,000. These costs accumulate through the value of assets seized and not recovered, out-of-pocket costs for hiring an attorney, immigration bond, and other expenses involved in supporting an immediate family member as they navigate the immigration court system. But they also include lost income due to disruptions to employment resulting from the arrest, and a physical inability to work while in detention, appearing in court, and immediately following deportation. In this article, we discuss how, when measured at the scale of the household, these financial costs fail to discriminate according to immigration or citizenship status, and accumulate to affect issues of poverty, education, housing security, health and development, and generational wealth inequality — all matters of sustained interest to state and local government. In the second half of the article, we draw on our research findings to evaluate various policies that states, counties, and municipalities can implement to mitigate these financial burdens while promoting the overall well-being of their constituents. Policies considered include: The “Immigrant Welcoming City” paradigm The limitation of routine cooperation and custody transfer between local and federal law enforcement Expanding access to permissible forms of identification Universal representation for immigration defendants The cultivation of community bond funds The promotion of worker-owned cooperatives Although these kinds of state or local initiatives cannot replace meaningful federal action on immigration reform, they can do much to provide relief and promote economic security for established immigrant and mixed-status families living in the United States, while contributing to overall community well-being and economic vitality.

References Powered by Scopus

Economic status and health in childhood: The origins of the gradient

1000Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Burden of Deportation on Children in Mexican Immigrant Families

360Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The impact of detention and deportation on Latino immigrant children and families: A quantitative exploration

230Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Cumulative Experiences of Immigration Enforcement Policy and the Physical and Mental Health Outcomes of Asian and Latinx Immigrants in the United States

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The corral apparatus: counterinsurgency and the architecture of death and deterrence along the Mexico/United States border

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Disrupting the Traffic Stop–to-Deportation Pipeline: The New York State Greenlight Law’s Intent and Implementation

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boyce, G. A., & Launius, S. (2020). The Household Financial Losses Triggered by an Immigration Arrest, and How State and Local Government Can Most Effectively Protect Their Constituents. Journal on Migration and Human Security, 8(4), 301–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331502420973976

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

43%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

29%

Researcher 2

29%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 2

33%

Psychology 2

33%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

17%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

17%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free