Schumpeter's split between "Pure" economics and institutional economics: Why methodological individualism was not fully considered

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While Joseph A. Schumpeter is classified as a pioneer of evolutionary economics in a wide sense and of entrepreneurship and innovation management in a narrower sense, Schumpeter is less known for his contributions in the area of scientific methodology and history of science. The chapter deals with methodological premises in Schumpeter's scientific positioning. In 1908, in his Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie, Schumpeter developed and pioneered his methodological individualism which is very much acknowledged. However, comparing these early positions with methodological writings in his History of Economic Analysis (1954) shows that he has not really shifted from methodological individualism to an institutional perspective that addresses the academic interplay and sees economic action rooted in historical predispositions, paths, and social constraints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bögenhold, D. (2021). Schumpeter’s split between “Pure” economics and institutional economics: Why methodological individualism was not fully considered. In Neglected Links in Economics and Society: Inequality, Organization, Work and Economic Methodology (pp. 181–195). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79193-3_9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free