The age of discontent: The revolt against interpretive cognitivism

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

By the end of the 21th century, the disparate cognitivist views endorsed by the exegetical jurists, Savigny, the "first" Jhering, Windscheid, and their fellows began to be perceived, and severely criticized, as false and obnoxious to the legal culture and the legal profession by a generation of jurists and legal theorists who, following the lead of the revolutionary instrumentalist turn advocated by the "second" Jhering, brought into the law the general spirit of derogation and impatient ennui for the long siècle that was finally drawing to a close-though they had to wait until 1914 for its final, ominous, demise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiassoni, P. (2016). The age of discontent: The revolt against interpretive cognitivism. In A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence: Volume 12 Legal Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: The Civil Law World, Tome 1: Language Areas, Tome 2: Main Orientations and Topics (pp. 601–625). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1479-3_50

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free