Quid pro quo? Reciprocal self-disclosure and communicative accomodation towards a virtual interviewer

21Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cassell and Miller [1] proposed the use of virtual agents as interviewers to be advantageous, because one can control for interviewer effects and variance, provide a sense of anonymity and increase the interviewee's motivation to complete the survey. Against the background of Communication Adaptation Theory and empirical results on reciprocal self-disclosure, we investigated the influence of the agent's reciprocal self-disclosure and wordiness on participants' self-disclosure and perception of the agent and the interview in an experimental study with a 2x2 between-subjects design. While reciprocal self-disclosure only affected perceived co-presence, wordiness influenced both the participants' verbal behavior (with regard to word usage and intimacy of answers) and their perception of the interview. Theoretical implications are discussed. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Von Der Pütten, A. M., Hoffmann, L., Klatt, J., & Krämer, N. C. (2011). Quid pro quo? Reciprocal self-disclosure and communicative accomodation towards a virtual interviewer. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6895 LNAI, pp. 183–194). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23974-8_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free